Sir Paul McCartney sues Sony over Beatles songs

Discussion in 'Music, TV, Cinema and The Arts' started by Robert Zimmerman, Jan 19, 2017.

  1. Robert Zimmerman

    Robert Zimmerman Masters Champion

    Joined:
    Mar 7, 2016
    Messages:
    718
    Likes Received:
    241
    Trophy Points:
    43
    "It could become one of the most important legal battles in music - Sir Paul McCartney is suing Sony over control of The Beatles' back catalogue.

    The star has gone to a US court, seeking to regain the publishing rights to 267 of the band's classic songs.

    He's been trying to get them back since the 1980s, when Michael Jackson famously out-bid him for the rights.

    Jackson's debt-ridden estate sold the songs to Sony last year, along with others including New York, New York.

    Sir Paul's legal case, filed in a Manhattan court on Wednesday, is over what is known as copyright termination - the right of authors to reclaim ownership of their works from music publishers after a specific length of time has passed.

    It was part of the US 1976 Copyright Act and, in recent years, performers like Prince, Billy Joel and Blondie have used it to regain control of their work.

    However, Duran Duran recently lost a similar case - when the British High Court ruled that the contracts they signed in the UK took precedence over their rights in the US.

    Under UK law, music publishing companies can control the copyright until 70 years after the artist's death.

    Sir Paul is worried that Sony/ATV Music Publishing will use Duran Duran's loss to challenge his attempts to obtain The Beatles' back catalogue.

    With his legal action, Sir Paul is trying to ensure Sony does not stand in his way by accusing him of a breach of contract or publishing agreement.

    "Rather than provide clear assurances to Paul McCartney that defendants will not challenge his exercise of his termination rights, defendants are clearly reserving their rights pending the final outcome of the Duran Duran litigation," said the legal papers filed on his behalf.

    The papers state that Sir Paul wants "quiet, unclouded title to his rights". Sony/ATV said it was "disappointed" by the lawsuit, calling it "both unnecessary and premature".

    Unlike Duran Duran, Sir Paul has filed his legal case in America, and the verdict could have major ramifications for other British artists."

    http://www.bbc.com/news/entertainment-arts-38675147

    Good on Sir Paul I say. It's been a long and sad history. Hope he wins back the rights in time for his 75th birthday. That would be the icing on the cake.
     
    britbox likes this.
  2. britbox

    britbox Multiple Major Winner

    Joined:
    Sep 20, 2015
    Messages:
    13,553
    Likes Received:
    2,312
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Interesting stuff... I was under the impression that he'd already got it back. I guess it's going to be a longer process than that.

    McCartney got shafted by Jackson in the 80s... He was trying to get Jackson into a consortium to buy them and Jackson went behind his back and bought the rights himself.
     
Loading...

Share This Page